Elizabeth Warren’s Wealth Tax Would Hurt More Than Just the ‘Tippy Top’

Wealth tax proponents claim only super rich people would be affected. But to raise the revenue Warren, Sanders, and Biden want, they’d have to tax the “working rich”—doctors, lawyers, and other hardworking high earners.

When running for president in 2020, Elizabeth Warren championed trustbusting and Medicare for All, the Green New Deal and regulation of big banks. But her plan’s pièce de résistance was a proposed “2-cent” tax on “ultra-millionaires.” She chirped that it would fall only on the “tippy-top,” that tiniest fraction of 1-percenters who have accumulated the most wealth in America. Taxing the wealth of the tippy-top isn’t just a Warren concept, though. Just last week, President Joe Biden announced the newest rendition of his budget, which calls for a wealth tax on households worth more than $100 million.

“A family with a net worth of more than $50 million”—or the richest 75,000 households—would “pay a 2% (or 2 cents) tax on every dollar of their net worth above $50 million and a 6% (or 6 cents) tax for every dollar above $1 billion,” Warren said. The $3.75 trillion in revenue she hopes to bring in with this tax over the next 10 years would be key to how she plans to pay for other items on her big-government wish list, like canceling student debt and free universal pre-K and Medicare for All.

Other estimates, however, like one from the Tax Foundation, say Warren’s tax would bring in only about $2.2 trillion. But her spending plans would cost more than $30 trillion over the next decade according to estimates by The New York Times.

Warren’s attempts to make such ambitious spending plans seem easily paid for is a form of smoke and mirrors common to big spenders on the left, even those who aren’t tethered to $30 trillion agendas like Biden. These plans, and the rhetoric with which they are promoted, indulge in a fantasy that expansive, expensive progressive agendas can be paid for exclusively by taxing the superrich, without any direct cost to ordinary taxpayers, or even to the affluent. – READ MORE

Related Articles

(PREMIUM) PAINE IN THE MORNING: 10 things you need to know this Wednesday – April 6, 2022

  There is also an ad free audio version of this episode you can listen to HERE. Elizabeth Warren’s Wealth Tax Would Hurt More Than Just the ‘Tippy Top’ – When running for president in 2020, Elizabeth Warren championed trustbusting and Medicare for All, the Green New Deal and regulation of big banks. But her plan’s…

To access this post, you must purchase The Hot Wire, The Hot Wire (DG), Monthly Supporter​ or Monthly Supporter​ (DG).

(PREMIUM) PAINE IN THE MORNING: What you need to know this Thursday – January 12, 2023

Here’s what you need to know today, Thursday – January 12, 2023. Aviation Groups Have Complained for Years About the Outdated FAA Alert System That Crashed Today – When a mix of bad weather and an outdated crew-tracking system caused a meltdown last month at Southwest Airlines, forcing the cancellation of thousands of flights, White House…

To access this post, you must purchase The Hot Wire, The Hot Wire (DG), Monthly Supporter​ or Monthly Supporter​ (DG).

(PREMIUM) PAINE IN THE MORNING: 9 things you need to know this Friday – September 17, 2021

There is also an ad free audio version of this episode you can listen to HERE. Today, Fauci Is Worried About A ‘Monster Variant.’ But Watch What He Said Last Week – Dr. Anthony Fauci said on Tuesday morning that COVID-19 might mutate into a “monster variant” capable of sending fully vaccinated people to the…

To access this post, you must purchase The Hot Wire, The Hot Wire (DG), Monthly Supporter​ or Monthly Supporter​ (DG).

Responses